The Tyranny of the Majority (to quote [livejournal.com profile] samvimes)

May. 18th, 2006 07:49 am
[personal profile] kyra_ojosverdes
[Poll #731318]

ETA: [livejournal.com profile] samvimes says "That's okay, I'm used to holding unpopular opinions" (not that I was, um, crowing about "winning" the poll or anything) and "At least it wasn't a clean sweep."

We are also giggling at the diplomats in the crowd who chose both James' and James's.

Date: 2006-05-18 01:59 pm (UTC)
ext_32976: (Default)
From: [identity profile] twfarlan.livejournal.com
Well, according to the Literacy Online guide available here, "James'" is preferred with "James's" being the less-preferred variant. I don't see why that should be different than "Frank's" or "Mike's," but the one thing you can count on in English is that every rule has an exception.

Date: 2006-05-18 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marialuminous.livejournal.com
Although I don't like the answer the webquiz gives

Date: 2006-05-18 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dimfuture.livejournal.com
According to Strunk and White, any possessive is apostrophe-s, regardless of the last consonant in the word being modified. So James's would technically be correct, even though it seems counterintuitive (to me, anyway).

I have my Chicago Manual of Style on the shelf, but I'm too lazy to pull it down and see what that says.

Date: 2006-05-18 03:50 pm (UTC)
ivy: (polite raven)
From: [personal profile] ivy
That's what I thought too. James' makes it sound like there are several folks named James, and the book belongs to all of them.

Date: 2006-05-18 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigermorph.livejournal.com
I love Strunk and White.

Date: 2006-05-18 09:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
Oh good - someone else quoted Elements of Style first.

Now I can just "ditto" this! :)

Date: 2006-05-18 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dimfuture.livejournal.com
Well, there's one thing we can agree on, right?

Date: 2006-05-19 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
*grin*

I know there's others... but let's just take it as a sign of the Apocolypse and run! ;)

Date: 2006-05-19 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kightp.livejournal.com
Strunk & White is the Bible.

I was taught that "s-apostrophe" applies only to possisives where the "s" makes the noun plural. "Apostrophe-s" applies to singular nouns that end in "s."

That's also how the Associated Press stylebook does it (and that's the one I used in 20 years as a newspaper reporter, so it's pretty well internalized).

Date: 2006-05-18 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tenderhooligan.livejournal.com
I really reading about this just lately and both 1 and 2 were recommended. I would always go with number 1.

Date: 2006-05-18 04:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
I was taught that the "Name-ending-with-s-apostrophe-no-further-s" form was only used for ancient, classical, and Biblical forms.

So "Moses'" if you're referring to the one in the Bible, but "Moses's", if you're referring to your buddy who happens to be named "Moses."

Other classical forms:

  • Jesus'
  • Socrates'
  • Judas'
  • Judah Maccabeus'
  • Josepheus'

Date: 2006-05-18 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canyonwren.livejournal.com
Diplomat? Huh?

*shrug* Both James' and James's are technically correct, with the caveat that James' is the preferred form unless you get annoyed by the Biblical thing that someone else mentioned.

Date: 2006-05-18 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dimfuture.livejournal.com
"with the caveat that James' is the preferred form..."

According to whom?

Not a challenge, I'm just curious.

Date: 2006-05-18 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canyonwren.livejournal.com
You're going to have to wait until I get home to get the source.

Date: 2006-05-18 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dimfuture.livejournal.com
Okay. I'll just sit here and stare until then: 0_0

Date: 2006-05-18 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyqkat.livejournal.com
Actually the correct form is Jim's.

Date: 2006-05-18 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kyra-ojosverdes.livejournal.com
Except when the James in question never goes by Jim and doesn't like being called Jim... the only person who calls him Jim is his father, highlighting, um, something *cough* public post *cough*

Date: 2006-05-18 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyqkat.livejournal.com
Ah! In that case it would be Mr. J's.

Date: 2006-05-18 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kyra-ojosverdes.livejournal.com
THERE you go!

Date: 2006-05-18 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wcg.livejournal.com
Either of the first two is acceptable, though the nuns would have whacked me across the knuckles if I'd ever written two letters s on either side of an apostraphe. Therefore I'd write it as James'.

Date: 2006-05-18 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roguespirit.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's what I was taught (the double s thing), too. Without being whacked on the knuckles, though. I was quick. (hehe)

What is the ANSWER?

Date: 2006-05-18 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jazzminarino.livejournal.com
I often have this problem. My name is Jess and my last name ends with S, so I usually end up dropping my last names and going by Jessie to avoid this...

... oh the trouble we go through to avoid the double s!

Date: 2006-05-18 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marialuminous.livejournal.com
You say "diplomat", I say "can't make up my dammned mind". Diplomat is a shorter term for it, though.

Date: 2006-05-18 11:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dimfuture.livejournal.com
Seems like you have a lot more results than you have people voting.

I call fraud at the polls. Either that or people are making multiple choices, which is cheating. Cheating, I say!

Date: 2006-05-19 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kyra-ojosverdes.livejournal.com
Can we leave my hanging chads out of this, please? It's personal!

Date: 2006-05-19 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gryphonwing.livejournal.com
A long time ago I went with the s-apostrophe-s solution. Because s-apostrophe was for plurals, and my last name (at the time) wasn't PLURAL, dammit.

Profile

kyra_ojosverdes

September 2007

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 192021 22
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 06:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios