![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Poll #731318]
ETA:
samvimes says "That's okay, I'm used to holding unpopular opinions" (not that I was, um, crowing about "winning" the poll or anything) and "At least it wasn't a clean sweep."
We are also giggling at the diplomats in the crowd who chose both James' and James's.
ETA:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
We are also giggling at the diplomats in the crowd who chose both James' and James's.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:01 pm (UTC)http://www.wecosoft.com/School/English/nouns2.htm
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:11 pm (UTC)I have my Chicago Manual of Style on the shelf, but I'm too lazy to pull it down and see what that says.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 04:15 pm (UTC)So "Moses'" if you're referring to the one in the Bible, but "Moses's", if you're referring to your buddy who happens to be named "Moses."
Other classical forms:
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 05:01 pm (UTC)*shrug* Both James' and James's are technically correct, with the caveat that James' is the preferred form unless you get annoyed by the Biblical thing that someone else mentioned.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 06:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:What is the ANSWER?
Date: 2006-05-18 08:40 pm (UTC)... oh the trouble we go through to avoid the double s!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 11:41 pm (UTC)I call fraud at the polls. Either that or people are making multiple choices, which is cheating. Cheating, I say!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 06:07 pm (UTC)