Quote of the Day
Nov. 10th, 2004 01:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Jesus speaks through the Republicans
I hope the election of George W. Bush is seen as a wake-up call to all the liberal Democrats who oppose God's will.
It is His doing that George W. Bush is still our president. Millions of born-again Christians helped win this election through our prayers and votes. Jesus speaks through the Republicans.
The Democrats will not be able to win elections until they renounce their sinful ways and stop encouraging abortions, gayness, and trying to take away our guns.
Earl Balboa
Washington Township
I hope the election of George W. Bush is seen as a wake-up call to all the liberal Democrats who oppose God's will.
It is His doing that George W. Bush is still our president. Millions of born-again Christians helped win this election through our prayers and votes. Jesus speaks through the Republicans.
The Democrats will not be able to win elections until they renounce their sinful ways and stop encouraging abortions, gayness, and trying to take away our guns.
Earl Balboa
Washington Township
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 03:12 pm (UTC)Dammit, you're awesome. I get to add you to my rather short, but terribly educated list, of Bible scholars. :)
Leviticus, in addition to being concerned about mixed fiber and menstruating spouses, also was concerned with what kind and how many animals to kill in offering to God. I also don't see much of that going on anymore.
Interesting view of Paul. I have such a terrible attitude towards him I hadn't even thought of what positive, contextual spin their might be.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 03:47 pm (UTC)(I just grew up reading the thing again and again and again and again... it seriously pisses off a fundie when you can take the verse they're quoting at you, name it, place it in context, and quote it back with the three or four verses which appear on either side and prove that they're trying to make the verse say something it doesn't.)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 03:58 pm (UTC)Don't I know it. :)
Doing this with my grandmother is frustrating though. Context, nothing - we'll end up arguing about the meanings of each word...Mostly I don't try anymore. I just ask her questions as she enjoys talking...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 03:59 pm (UTC)See, I agree with that. But if you're talking to a fundie, they will insist that Paul was writing with God's guidance, therefore it is True and Timeless. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 06:13 pm (UTC)(Thing is, since the Constitution is less than 300 years old, it can be argued with some authority that its language and tone still very much suit the current era. That's tougher for a book whose most RECENT additions are at least 1700 years old.)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 07:35 pm (UTC)It slays me when fundamentalists can't even apply their own rules with consistency. They'll rail on about homosexuality and dismiss the rest of the things that the same book says are "abominations" without even batting an eyelash.
Makes me crazy!
Hence
But then of course, the Christians have so little [if any] understanding of the Books Of Moses, because they don't have any of the rather extended commentary that came with it. For starters, G-d doesn't "hate" anything.